On
the Fringes:
Marginalised
Voices in English Literature
ISBN 978-81-7273-657-6
AuthorsPress, New Delhi
Worldwide Circulation through Authorspress Global Network. The book is also available online on flipkart, infibeam, alibris, amazon, snapdeal, ebay, Southasiabooks and so on
First Published in 2012 by Authorspress, New Delhi-110 016
First Published in 2012 by Authorspress, New Delhi-110 016
As stated
in the Post-Colonial Studies Reader, “Literary Resistance (LR) . . . can be
seen as a form of contractual understanding between the text and the reader . .
. buttressed by a political and cultural aesthetic at work in the culture. And
Resistance Literature (RL) . . . can be seen as that category of literary
writing which emerges as an integral part of an organised struggle or
resistance for national liberation.”
With both
the categories of LR and RL as the backbone of the Postcolonial theory, we know
that domination is the mother of resistance and the forces of power-play.
Resistance is very much conditioned by those very socio-political forces that
it seeks to challenge. The birth of the Post-Colonial theory, underlines two
important points:
1)
Domination and resistance are mutually interdependent;
2) The
Will to Power is central to both.
The
difference between LR and RL is subtle and important. If Gayatri
Chakravarty Spivak explores the issue of the “subaltern voice” in one of the
foundational texts of Postcolonial Studies: “Can the Subaltern Speak?” and
notes that any attempt to recover the voices, perspectives and subjectivities
of the socially outcaste is heavily compromised. We also have Frantz Fanon and
of course, Homi Bhabha who argue in favour of the pathos of ‘cultural
confusion’ so that it can be used as a strategy of political subversion.
Notions of the orient “Other” and European “Self” throughout the world- and
questions of identity back home and the world over have been effectively
tackled by writers like Bhisham Sahni, Shashi Tharoor, Amrinder Kaur, Taslima
Nasreen, Manjushree Thapa, Mahasweta Devi and of course, writers of the Dalit
literature in India. Whether it be an analysis of Tawfiq Awwad or Mongane
Serote, or our very own Mulk Raj Anand and Raja Rao, their writing put forth
the marginalised subjectivity in literature. How far have the marginalised
voices reached? Can they still not speak? Do other social/cultural theories
offer a way out of this silence/confusion? How have the marginalised been
portrayed in Literature? The present anthology On the Fringes: Marginalised Voices
in English Literature attempts
to explore such marginalize voices and the problem involved in crushing or
establishing the “oppressive power structures”.